Apartment owners at Altea la Nova, were each asked, by the President, to help pay the fees of lawyers, seeking damages on our behalf, from Admival.
They each paid Euros 264. Same paid immediately, many others reluctantly coughed-up only after being threatened with having the legal cots added to their Community charges.
In the event of a successful outcome, we were assured that the money would be returned to us.
The lawyers were successful, and after their fees, and other legal costs had been deducted, the Community received more than Euros 400,000 in damages.
That was some month ago. We are still waiting for our money.
I understand that, when asked about this money, the President said that it wasn't possible to return the money subscribed by the owners, because some of them had since sold their apartments, and moved on.
]'ll play that again: It wasn't possible to return the money subscribed by the owners, because some of them had since sold their apartments and moved on!
Make any sense to you? Because it doesn't to me.
Surely it would be simplicity itself to return the money to contributing owners, who still retain their properties, and to hold the rest of the money, for six months, to give those who had sold, and moved on, time to make a claim.
Or is that too easy?
TheWatcher
They each paid Euros 264. Same paid immediately, many others reluctantly coughed-up only after being threatened with having the legal cots added to their Community charges.
In the event of a successful outcome, we were assured that the money would be returned to us.
The lawyers were successful, and after their fees, and other legal costs had been deducted, the Community received more than Euros 400,000 in damages.
That was some month ago. We are still waiting for our money.
I understand that, when asked about this money, the President said that it wasn't possible to return the money subscribed by the owners, because some of them had since sold their apartments, and moved on.
]'ll play that again: It wasn't possible to return the money subscribed by the owners, because some of them had since sold their apartments and moved on!
Make any sense to you? Because it doesn't to me.
Surely it would be simplicity itself to return the money to contributing owners, who still retain their properties, and to hold the rest of the money, for six months, to give those who had sold, and moved on, time to make a claim.
Or is that too easy?
TheWatcher